Perceived Effectiveness of Parent Representation Social Workers by Legal Professionals Involved with Indigent Defendants

Authors

  • Jeremiah W. Jaggers University of Utah College of Social Work
  • Aurene Wilford
  • Ileana Anderson
  • Joanna Bettmann

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/24249

Keywords:

child welfare, parent representation, social work, indigent defendants, foster care

Abstract

The total number of children in the U.S. foster care system exceeds 428,000. Previous research indicates that when social workers and legal professionals work together, children and their families benefit significantly. Parents who effectively engage in the child welfare system are more likely to benefit from services and reunify with their children. The present study employed a phenomenological approach to explore how a parent representation pilot, which paired social workers with public defenders to better represent the needs of families in the child welfare system, was experienced by legal professionals. Judges and family court attorneys (n = 9) found the program to be helpful in reunifying families. Public defenders were able to leverage the social worker’s skills and experience to facilitate more positive outcomes, while reducing case burden. Challenges were also identified and included a lack of interdisciplinary training, potential overlap in ethical responsibilities, and role confusion. Structured intervention programs that encourage collaboration between social workers and legal professionals may improve case outcomes for indigent families involved in the child welfare system. It is advised that social work undertake a formal multidisciplinary approach in support of public defenders, which may serve to encourage positive case outcomes.

References

American Bar Association, Center for Professional Responsibility. (2019). Model rules of professional conduct: Preamble & scope. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/

professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_preamble_scope/

Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2019). Kids count data book: State trends in child well-being. Annie E. Casey Foundation. https://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-2019kidscountdatabook-2019.pdf

Barsky, A. E. (1996). Mediation and empowerment in child protection cases. Mediation Quarterly, 14(2), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900140204

Boyas, J., & Wind, L. (2010). Employment-based social capital, job stress, and employee burnout: A public child welfare employee structural model. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(3), 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.009

Bracewell, T. E. (2018). Multidisciplinary team involvement and prosecutorial decisions in child sexual abuse cases. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(6), 567-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0557-1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buchanan, S., & Orme, J. (2019). Impact of social work practice in public defense. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(3), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1480559

Carnochan, S., Taylor, S., Abramson-Madden, A., Han, M., Rashid, S., Maney, J., Teuwen, S., & Austin, M. J. (2007). Child welfare and the courts: An exploratory study of the relationship between two complex systems. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1300/j479v01n01_06

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

Courtney, M. E., & Hook, J. (2011). Evaluation of the impact of enhanced parental legal representation on the timing of permanency outcomes for children in foster care. Partners for our children, Discussion Paper, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.016

Courtney, M., & Hook, J. (2012). Evaluation of the impact of enhanced parental legal representation on the timing of permanency outcomes for children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1337-1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.016

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.

Depanfilis, D., & Zlotnik, J. (2008). Retention of front-line staff in child welfare: A systematic review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 995-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.12.017

Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1319-1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6

Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861.

Geurin, L., Otis, M., & Royse, D. (2013). Increasing alternative sentencing in the juvenile justice system through a partnership between public defenders and social workers. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 3(3), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928x.2013.859026

Gideon v. Wainwright, Volume 372 U.S. 335. (1963). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/372/335

Gorden, R. L. (1969). Interviewing: Strategy, techniques and tactics. Dorsey Press.

Greene, R. (2017). Human behavior theory and social work practice. Routledge.

Han, M., Carnochan, S., & Austin, M. J. (2007). The challenges to promoting collaboration between child protection services workers and court professionals: An exploratory study of case records. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(3), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1300/j479v01n03_07

Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence Based Nursing, 16(4), 98.

Johnson, P., & Cahn, K. (1995). Improving child welfare practice through improvements in attorney-social worker relationships. Child Welfare, 74(2), 383-394.

Lizano, E., & Mor Barak, M. (2015). Job burnout and affective wellbeing: A longitudinal study of burnout and job satisfaction among public child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 55(C), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.005

Measor, L. (1985). Interviewing: A strategy in qualitative research. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Strategies of educational research: Qualitative methods (pp. 55-77). Falmer Press.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Preamble to the code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

Nuance [computer software]. (n.d.). Dragon Speech Recognition Version 15. https://www.nuance.com/dragon.html

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1208.

Pinkney, S. (2013). Trust relationships between children, social welfare professionals and the organisations of welfare. In H. Warming (Ed.), Participation, citizenship and trust in children’s lives. Studies in childhood and youth (pp. 93-113). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295781_6

Plummer, K. (1983). Documents of life: An introduction to the problems and literature of a humanistic method. Unwin Hyman.

Porter, D. (2017). Paying for justice: The human cost of public defender fees. American Civil Liberties Union. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/

document/pdfees-report.pdf

Pott, R. (2017). Delivering social work services in collaboration with the legal representation for individual clients: An effective, ethical and economical approach to supporting families in child abuse and neglect legal proceedings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.011

Rubin, D., Downes, K., O'Reilly, A., Mekonnen, R., Luan, X., & Localio, R. (2008). Impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162(6), 550-556. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.162.6.550

Ryan, J., Hong, J., Herz, D., & Hernandez, P. (2010). Kinship foster care and the risk of juvenile delinquency. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(12), 1823-1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.003

Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (p. 51–80). Sage.

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.

Steen, J. (2020). The role of voice suppression in case managers’ job satisfaction and retention. Advances in Social Work, 20(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.18060/23707

Travis, D., Lizano, E., & Mor Barak, M. (2016). ‘I'm so stressed!’: A longitudinal model of stress, burnout and engagement among social workers in child welfare settings. British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 1076-1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct205

Utah Indigent Defense Commission. (2017). Utah indigent defense commission: Judiciary interim committee. The sixth amendment. https://le.utah.gov/interim/2017/pdf/00002494.pdf

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Child welfare outcomes report date. https://cwoutcomes.acf.hhs.gov/cwodatasite/threeOne/index

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(148) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Willis, N., Chavkin, N., & Leung, P. (2016). Finding “Health” and “Meaning” in Texas-sized turnover: Application of seminal management principles for administration and research in U.S. public child welfare agencies. Advances in Social Work, 17(2), 116- 133. https://doi.org/10.18060/20856

Wood, S. M., Summers, A., & Duarte, C. S. (2016). Legal representation in the juvenile dependency system: Travis County, Texas’ parent representation pilot project. Family Court Review, 54(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12218

Downloads

Published

2021-06-14